Saturday, December 6, 2008

10,000 Hours of Deliberate Practice Toward Expert Performance

In "The Role of Deliberate Practice in the Acquisition of Expert Performance" by K. Anders Ericsson, Ralf Th. Krampe, and Clemens Tesch-Romer, it is stated that expert performance is the result of intense practice extended for a minimum of 10 years. Others say 10,000 hours of practice. Not just any practice; however, but Deliberate Practice.

Differences Between Work, Play and Deliberate Practice

"The external rewards of work activities include social recognition and, most important, money in the form of prizes and pay, which enables performers to sustain a living. In play and deliberate practice, external rewards are almost completely lacking."

"In contrast to play, deliberate practice is a highly structured activity, the explicit goal of which is to improve performance. Specific tasks are invented to overcome weaknesses, and performance is carefully monitored to provide cues for ways to improve it further. We claim that deliberate practice requires effort and is not inherently enjoyable. Individuals are motivated to practice because practice improves performance. In addition, engaging in deliberate practice generates no immediate monetary rewards and generates costs associated with access to teachers and training environments. Thus, an understanding of the long-term consequences of practice is important."

In "Expert Performance and Deliberate Practice" Erocsson goes on to say:

"Furthermore, experts have acquired domain-specific memory skills that allow them to rely on long-term memory (Long-Term Working Memory, Ericsson & Kintsch, 1995) to dramatically expand the amount of information that can be kept accessible during planning and during reasoning about alternative courses of action. The superior quality of the experts' mental representations allow them to adapt rapidly to changing circumstances and anticipate future events in advance. The same acquired representations appear to be essential for experts' ability to monitor and evaluate their own performance (Ericsson, 1996; Glaser, 1996) so they can keep improving their own performance by designing their own training and assimilating new knowledge."

We can conclude that experts are highly motivated people who dedicate a lot of time and energy to attain a long-term goal of expertise in some field. Expertise takes more than just ordinary practice and experience. Expertise requires a motivation to acquire a long-term goal, the ability to know where performance needs to be improved, and a structured plan to constantly evaluate performance toward the goal of improving performance.

Additional Links:

Setting Effective Trading Goals
Thoughts On Goal Setting for 2009
Freakonomics
SSK Day Trading Futures (use of videos for self-evaluation)
"Talent is Overrated: What Really Separates World-Class Performers from Everybody Else"

Charles

2 comments:

  1. Hello charles, I just found out about your blog from a friend. Thanks for the links to our work! If you could send me a post, I would like to link your work on my page with some other fellow traders that stand out. I like your work on profile theory and divergencs. You have a nice blog, with cool links and nice daily commentary, keep up the good work. You could send me an email anytime, daytradingfutures@tamta.net Talk soon, Best, Steve (SSK)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Steve,

    Thanks for the kind comments about my work. I haven't looked at all of your videos yet, but I realize that taping and then reviewing your trades is a great self-help tool, which I need to start doing soon. The brain is more effective at remembering pictures than any other sensory medium. I do enjoy your work and comments.

    One of the things that I am working on is to first analyze the daily and 60 minute charts looking for key support / resistance or pivot points, such as actual turning points in the market or Fibonacci levels. Then pay attention to how the market reacts to these points. I think that you will find that divergences are more relevant at these points. This is something that Linda Raschke tried to drill into my head a few years ago, but I am just now beginning to understand what she was trying to tell me.

    I don't have the book yet, but I will also be reviewing "The Nature of Trends" by Ray Barros. I'm anticipating that I will be able to apply his work and Linda's to improve my ability to analyze the longer term patterns in the market.

    I am also spending a lot of time understanding the psychology of learning through the work of Dr. Steenbarger and Dr. Ericsson and others. Some fellow traders said years ago that it takes 10,000 trades to become good at this. I then brushed their comments off as nonsense, but now realize that they were right. People don't realize that Einstein took 12 years trying to figure out the paradox of space, time, speed and light. Einstein was extremely intelligent, but the real difference between Einstein and the rest of us is that he was willing to spend 12 years trying to solve a puzzle and not give up trying. Ten years, 10,000 hours or 10,000 trades are numbers that keep showing up in the process of learning.

    Charles

    ReplyDelete